Computer Vision Syndrome: Is It a Silent Epidemic?
Downloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56692/upjo.2023110104Keywords:
Computer vision syndrome, Computer users, Screen time.Dimensions Badge
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 UP JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMILOGY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
© UPJO, 2023 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.
Abstract
Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of computer vision syndrome and evaluate the effects of interventions applied to computer
users in a tertiary care hospital.
Materials and Methods: In our study, 102 eyes of 51 people (non-medicos) with desk job using computers/mobile were taken
as the study group. The Schirmer test, tear breakup time (TBUT) and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) were evaluated.
Accordingly, they were given treatment and followed up.
Results: In our study, we included 51 subjects who were a regular user of mobile and computers. Mean screen time was 6.08
± 1.5 hours. Before treatment, the mean Schirmer’s, TBUT and OSDI test were 8.85 ± 1.2 mm (range 5.5–11.5 mm), 7.64 ±
2.4 seconds (range 4.0–12.5 seconds) and 30.47 ± 13.1 (range 10.40–62.50), respectively. The prevalence of dry eye was 58%,
according to OSDI severity grading. After treatment, the Schirmer1, TBUT and OSDI tests showed improvement and the results
were highly significant (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: It is important to optimize the exposure time and improve awareness among users. Its high time now, every
institution should come up with a few guidelines in concern with the high screen time of the desk job worker.
How to Cite
Downloads
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Mohmad Uzair, Summia Singh, Neelima Mehrotra, Posterior Polar Cataract , UP Journal of Ophthalmology: Vol. 6 No. 01 (2018): UP JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Similar Articles
- Mohd Uzair Zakai, SUMBUL S. KHAN, NEELIMA MEHROTRA, AKHIL AGARWAL, JEEVAN SHANKAR VERMA, AMRITA BAJPAI, Cross-sectional study of computer vision syndrome among human resource professionals in tertiary care hospital , UP Journal of Ophthalmology: Vol. 5 No. 01 (2017): UP JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.